lf1

Men buy baby boy and pass him around for sex

This has got to be one of the most upsetting and disgusting sex abuse cases ever. Mark J. Newton, 42, was convicted of buying a baby boy, molesting him when he was between the ages of 2 and 6, and passing him around among eight men. Peter Truong, 36, an Australian citizen, also faces charges.

Man sentenced for using son in child-porn conspiracy, on USAToday.com.

Story suggested by a Lovefraud reader.

 



4 Comments on "Men buy baby boy and pass him around for sex"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. blossom4th says:

    How could they do such a debased thing to that little child?! Perverted adults can make choices and “do their own thing” but to take a child’s innocence and future with such acts….it makes me want to cry and vomit at the same time!



    Report this comment

  2. Tea Light says:

    What punishment could possibly tip the scales of justice the child’s way. Life in prison doesn’t begin to cover it. It’s the same feeling I had with Ariel Castro. I’m socially liberal in almost all respects but some crimes indicate such extremes of predatory behaviour, such extremes of cruelty and depravity that I wonder if execution after guilty verdicts and due process are done is actually acceptable.



    Report this comment

  3. Delores says:

    NO, I cannot believe this is possible. These men deservee torture and death. A 40 year sentence for some of them is just not acceeptable in any way shape or form. This kind of behavior, both the depravity and the injustice, is the result of the current idealization of tolerance at any price. Human decency depends on intolerance. Our world has confused intolerance with bigotry and it is just not going to work. Some people do some intolerable things and they need to be exposed and punished publicly. This judge was a coward. America is a coward allowing Islamic Law and depravity to enter our judicial system. It is time for some intolerance to save the innocent,



    Report this comment

  4. Babs94540 says:

    What I’d like to know is why didn’t the charges against this monster include rape? This poor, damned little helpless child must have been repeatedly RAPED, by the man who bought him and the perp’s pedophile cohorts. Its beyond sickening. Its beyond injustice that this man should somehow not be charged with and convicted of repeated counts of rape of a minor child. The irony is unbelievable, that the judge should state that the case was “too horrific for a jury.” This was too horrific for the little boy, don’t you think, judge? To live with that kind of abuse from toddlerhood? It will be a miracle if this little child isn’t emotionally crippled for life, and I hope that if he’s sustained physical damage, he will recover. This has really upset me. I can’t handle this kind of information, its going to impact me for a long time, I’m afraid.



    Report this comment

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.