lovefraud2
lovefraud2
ArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchEnglishFilipinoFrenchGermanGreekHindiIndonesianItalianJapaneseKoreaMalayPersianPolishPortugueseRussianSpanishTurkishvietnamese

Raped, then framed

Seemona Sumasar, a bakery owner and former Morgan Stanley analyst, filed charges that she was raped by her ex-boyfriend, Jerry Ramrattan. In retaliation, Ramrattan allegedly framed Sumasar with three crimes. Prosecutors believed the crimes, refused to check her alibi, and Sumasar sat in jail for seven months. Finally, an informant stated that the charges were false, and the case unraveled. Samasar just filed a lawsuit against the New York police. Read about this shocking case:

A revenge plot so intricate, the prosecutors were pawns, on NYTimes.com.

NY woman Seemona Sumasar says ex-boyfriend raped her, then framed her, on CBSNews.com.

Story suggested by a Lovefraud reader.



29 Comments on "Raped, then framed"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Truthspeak says:

    All I can say about this case is that it’s shameful and I hope that the Police Department is sued until their eyes bleed.

    After the incident that caused the exspath to leave (and, thankfully, NEVER come back), I was in a state of medical shock and experiencing PSTD symptoms on a level that’s difficult to describe. I was terrified that the exspath was going to come back, or send someone to do only-god-knows-what. When I called the barracks, the individual who answered asked me, “Aren’t you the one that beat up her husband? What could you possibly be AFRAID of?” He laughed, and I answered, “Sir, you don’t know the circumstances. Nevermind.”

    I don’t believe in justice, anymore. I HOPE for it, but I cannot predict that it will ever happen in any circumstance.

    I hope that Sumasar’s case brings some sense of justice to her, and to all victims of sociopaths, but I won’t be holding my breath.

  2. G1S says:

    All I am saying is that there are people who turn against other people, as well as commit crimes, who are not Ps.

    People are flawed in many ways. Jealousy, greed, and manipulation do not fall under the sole domain of psychopaths.

    There are many motives for going along with others, such as

    -people-pleasing
    -fear of abandonment
    -needing to be loved
    -too tired, hungry, or in a rush to argue (It’s easier to go along)
    -not wanting to get abused (Remember what happened the last time you said no to me?)
    -not getting shot (literally having a gun to one’s head and then there is a follow-up threat to come after that person if a word is ever spoken)
    -not having a loved one harmed if the person doesn’t participate (I’ll kill your X if you don’t do this – or – Don’t do this, and so-and-so will have a very hard time walking safely home from work/school)
    -doesn’t question things (Kid, I’ll give you $5.00 if you leave this package outside that lady’s door)
    -being blackmailed into doing something (Does your wife know that you’ve been fooling around with…?)
    -”forgiving” a perceived debt
    -thrillseekers (Wouldn’t it be fun to do…?)
    -drug addicts (need the money for a fix)
    -homeless person (needs the money for food)
    -people who never turn down a request for help
    -people who believe that everybody is good with no ulterior motives
    -people who refuse to judge a person without good reason to
    -prestige
    -street cred (Thug X asked me to do something!!) etc.

    Some people are not the brightest people in the world or are mentally challenged and can be easily convinced by others. Some people are new to the area (foreign visitors, for example) and don’t know the local ways so they go along with what they’re told.

    Also, somebody participating in a small part of a much larger event or series of actions may not even know that the rest of the things are going on.

    For example, if somebody convinces me to open a door for a seemingly legitimate reason, and I’m Helpful Hannah and happy to do what I can to help another human being, does that make me a P because I let the perpetrators into the building to murder someone? They had their hands full with packages, they seemed like nice people, and I just held the door for them.

    The masterminds behind everything, that’s another issue entirely.

    I fear that if everyone is labeled a spath, then one’s creditability is lost.

    We can’t cry wolf (P) every time somebody does something rotten to another person. What police department is going to believe me if I keep calling saying that every Tom, Dick, and Harry/Peter, Paul, and Mary is a P? I’ll sound crazy.

    If I label everyone who has a glass of wine an alcoholic, who is going to believe me? Yes, some of those people are alcoholics, but not everybody. People know that. Do the same sort of thing by labeling everyone a P and we end up with the same reaction – maybe some of these are, but everybody?

    If I want my accusations to be taken as creditable, I feel I can’t apply this label to everyone every time I see somebody with an alcoholic drink in hand.

    And that’s what I don’t want – to lose my creditability when speaking about Ps.

    We’re already up against the stereotype of Ps that Hollywood has implanted in people’s minds. Inaccurate or not, that’s what people are going to think of when we bring up the word “psychopath.” I’m certainly not going to open myself up to being discredited by suggesting that anyone who has committed a crime fits this stereotype. That isn’t what I am suggesting, but that is a hurdle that need to be taken into consideration and overcome.

    I do not want to come across as a lunatic, somebody with an ax to grind against society, or that I am out for vengence against a particular person.

    I very much want people to know about psychopaths, what they are capable of, and the lengths that they will go to in order to achieve their ends.

    Not every cop is rotten. Not every lawyer is bad. There is misinformation and obsolete information floating around. There is so much information to know that even the most diligent person or agency can’t keep up on it all. Budget restraints keep personnel from getting training or having access to the most up-to-date information.

    Generalizations work against valid viewpoints; they do not support them. Specifics support valid viewpoints.

    Stop with the specifics. Do not extrapolate. If somebody else draws conclusions from what we’ve said, there is nothing we can do about that, which is why we need to be as specific and detailed as possible.

    I’m very, very careful what I say because if I lose my creditability, it is near impossible to gain it back.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Wordpress SEO Plugin by SEOPressor