lf1

The Worst Historians

One thing that’s certain about sociopaths and exploitive personalities generally: when it comes to relationships, they are the worst historians.

They are chronic historical revisionists—that is, they are constantly revising history.

And their revisions are headed in predictable directions—to make them look good, unguilty, unresponsible for the damage they’ve caused and, of course, whenever possible, to position themselves as the true victims of the circumstances.

And that’s, of course, when history interests them. And history will interest them, but only when they can use it against you. If it suits their need, say, to punish you for a decision you made in the past, even before you met them, abusers may use this knowledge of your history as a weapon of attack or control in perpetuity.

The issue on which they fixate, for instance, may pertain to a sexual relationship that predated your knowing them; they may have coaxed, if not coerced, this information from you, perhaps in the honeymoon phase of your relationship, on the pretext of their wanting to know, preciously, everything about you.

They will not have hinted at their truer, underlying motive: to stumble upon eternally damning evidence of your corruption for future, endless punitive purposes.

On the other hand, when history obstructs, rather than enables, the exploiter’s self-centered agenda, then surprise surprise, he will have no use for, or interest in, it whatsoever.

History (accurate history, that is) will instead loom as a great annoyance to be ignored, if not aggressively suppressed. In such cases, the exploiter is likely to frame your interest in the history of his exploitation of you as off-limits.

How ironic—suddenly the self-centered, chronic boundary violator invokes the sanctitude of his boundaries, fingering you as lacking respect for his space. This would be funny, if it wasn’t so not-funny.

The problem of the exploiter’s manipulation or censorship of relationship history is grave inasmuch as healthy relationships depend on partners processing their history together with integrity; and also with the aim of deepening their intimate connection through joint efforts to understand, and make mutual meaning, of their shared history.

When this process is corrupted, there is no chance for a healthy relationship.

The exploiter, by virtue of his underlying disdain of your integrity, boundaries and individuality, makes this vital collaborative process impossible. This is not a process he will ever feel motivated to engage; and it’s a process, in any case, that will overwhelm his deficient capacity for true intimacy.

(My use of “he” in this post was for convenience’s sake. This article is
copyrighted (c) 2009 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)



119 Comments on "The Worst Historians"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. OxDrover says:

    Dear Pollyannanomore,

    the site you quoted is somewhat suspect in their rendering of “science” so you might want to confirm some of the finding that they quote. There seems to be a financial aspect behind that site. There is another site, linked here to “Aftermath surviving psychopathy, which is a non profit funded by Dr. robert hare’s foundation.

    I agree tht there are some indications that environment of ancestors does effect several generations. I don’t have time now to discuss it but you might go to Aftermath and look around, there are many professionals there who are “into” some good scientific research. Also links to some good groups. Oxy



    Report this comment

  2. bratcw says:

    Mine actually revises women out of his blog. When I was with him, I was mentioned all over it, and commented on posts. When he was cultivating his next victim (yet still with me), he revised me completely out of it, so there was no mention of me, and the comments were deleted. I can only imagine that he did this with women before me, because I never saw any other comments from girlfriends who pre-dated me, even though he told me he’d been in several relationships. He also erased all my pictures from his Flickr account. Once he’s “done” with a woman (whether they’ve broken up or not), he erases her from his life. It took me a while to realize that normal guys acknowledge their past relationships and move on – they don’t erase them.



    Report this comment

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.